377 good or bad? need opinions

Need help with your car?

Moderators: mokangena, DN, scottab, Carl Blanton

377 good or bad? need opinions

Postby six-point on Fri Aug 17, 2012 10:21 am

im looking at doing a 377 with a voodoo x cam 525/546, 570 max lift beehive valve springs, hydraulic lifters, dual timing chain, double hump heads, 750 edelbrock. would like your guys opinions on if that would be a good set up or not. or what i should change to make it a better set up
six-point
 
Posts: 24
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 11:34 pm

Re: 377 good or bad? need opinions

Postby six-point on Wed Sep 26, 2012 7:42 pm

:layrubber:
six-point
 
Posts: 24
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 11:34 pm

Re: 377 good or bad? need opinions

Postby ken goddard on Thu Sep 27, 2012 5:41 pm

what are you going to use the motor in.
ken goddard
 
Posts: 91
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:02 pm

Re: 377 good or bad? need opinions

Postby six-point on Wed Oct 03, 2012 9:34 pm

Third gen camaro with a 350th trans & will have a 4 link rearend with 3.73 posi.
six-point
 
Posts: 24
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 11:34 pm

Re: 377 good or bad? need opinions

Postby zziggy on Thu Oct 04, 2012 6:44 am

The old fuelie heads will hold you back a bunch on power.
They where OK for 283's even mild 327's.
But the new engines need new heads. The Pro-Filers are OK as are Brodix IK200, even the Edelbrock and Trick Flow 195 heads are pretty good as is.
71 Camaro 355 NA
11.1906 @ 118.92
60' time 1.5067
User avatar
zziggy
 
Posts: 249
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 10:21 am

Re: 377 good or bad? need opinions

Postby six-point on Tue Oct 09, 2012 5:16 pm

ok well i changed the heads im going with the 92 305 heads which had the bigger ports & cam change to voodoo x 560/580 lift & 600 max lift beehive valve springs
six-point
 
Posts: 24
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 11:34 pm


Return to Tech Talk

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], WAR1 and 0 guests